What It Means When Cities Go Bankrupt

Presented By Nick Bautista

With the recent news of Detroit filing for Chapter 9 bankruptcy and more closer to home the California cities of Stockton, San Bernardino, and Mammoth Lakes, the question remains, what does it means for a city to file for bankruptcy?

The law is pretty clear on what bankruptcy is and sets forth 4 eligibility requirements for filing for Chapter 9 which are found on the courts website. http://www.uscourts.gov/FederalCourts/Bankruptcy/BankruptcyBasics/Chapter9.aspx.

All bankruptcies are different, and as such it is hard to compare bankruptcies to one another.

 But, basically it comes down to the city not being able to pay the debt that the municipalities have agreed to.

On the one hand it seems odd that cities file for bankruptcy when they will always be able to tax their citizens. Cities get funding from taxing our properties and sales tax on goods. Problems though arise when all those revenue streams dry up as they did in 2008. Property values dropped and people needed to save more, both of these things negatively affecting city revenue.

So what happens to the citizens in the city? Well, most of the cuts that come out of bankruptcy are to government and public workers. A lot of the reason these cities are bankrupt is due to pensions that cannot be sustained due to their high payout assumptions and returns needed to meet those payouts. With interest rates so low, the projections made aren’t sustainable. So, the first thing to get cut is pension benefits or public worker hours.

In terms of people who live in the city life goes on. They don’t really notice dramatic changes, although change is likely to happen. In short Bankruptcy is never good, but then again, it brings on the option of the city to start anew and hopefully become better for it.

Why Are You Listening To The News?

Presented by Nick Bautista

Marketwatch had a bad headline the other day. “Key Market Indicator Now Generating a sell signal.” The article goes on to describe an indicator that was created in the 1970s and is used to supposedly tell investors when to buy and sell. The indicator looks at companies that make up the index and creates a spread based on the companies who are reaching their highs along with companies reaching new lows. If the indicator sees that companies are moving to these highs and lows it can predict where the market is heading.

Not but two days later the same author came out with this article, “Buy and hold strategy wins again.” Both articles were big type, front section headliners and the content inside couldn’t be more polar opposite. (BTW the author is Mark Hulbert)

If you are listening/reading the majority of investment news you are making a poor decision. News companies are in one business, the get viewers business or more specifically the entertainment business. Sure the numbers are factual for stock prices and the like, but does Mark Hulbert have your specific and best interest in mind? Of course not, no financial advisor would have such a short term outlook, let alone flip strategies from sell, to buy and hold.

The news will always be entertaining because that’s how they make money, but in truth they don’t have your best interest in mind. Think about your emotions related to your money, are you letting the news dictate what you are feeling? If so, you need to stop listening to the news and start listening to your advisor. Your advisor should know your specific situation and can help you secure your financial future through financial planning.